Committee Chairman Dan Huberty, the author of House Bill 21, praised the committee for building legislation that would boost per-student funding for almost every school district and charter in the state. He also acknowledged the losses some school districts would have to face: “I know that we didn’t help everybody. And we tried.”
HB 21 is now eligible to be considered by the full House. The House Appropriations Committee is expected to pass its budget this week, with  a full House vote likely next week. The proposed Senate budget, expected to pass the chamber on Tuesday, would cut state funding for public schools by $1.8 billion in general revenue, and use local property tax revenue to make up the difference.
Tuesday’s vote represents one step in an effort to overhaul a tired school finance system, which many agree does not fund schools adequately or equitably. The Texas Supreme Court last yearruled the system constitutional, but in need of major reform.
HB 21 would increase the base funding the state doles out to districts per student, in part by increasing funding the state gives to schools with bilingual and dyslexic students. Members voted on a substitute version of the bill, which more fully addresses how to tide over school districts losing money. This version does not yet have a fiscal note.
One of the most controversial parts of Huberty’s bill would eliminate a state aid program designed to offset a decade-old tax cut. That has upset many small, rural school districts that depend on the program to keep their doors open.
When legislators reduced property taxes by a third in 2006, they guaranteed school districts at least the same amount of funding as they received in 2005-06. That program is set to expire Sept. 1, with 156 school districts still relying on it.
Huberty’s bill would let the program expire and create a transitional $200 grant program over the next two years to help all school districts that lose money under the bill. Districts losing money would get more funding from the grant program if they have higher property tax rates.
Christy Rome, executive director of the Texas School Coalition, which represents some districts relying on the 2006 state aid program, said the bill provides a “landing pad” for districts that would otherwise fall off a funding cliff.
“That’s a cushion that districts will not otherwise receive without passage of this, or other, legislation,” she said. “It’s still better to have cushion than to have districts completely fall on their face.”
Rep. Morgan Meyer, R-Dallas, was the committee’s sole vote against the bill. He said he could not support the measure because Highland Park, a school district he represents, is in the small percentage of districts that would lose funding.
Highland Park ISD would lose about $208 per student in 2018, and $56 per student in 2019, according to the Legislative Budget Board’s calculations. In both years, it would be eligible for funding from the hardship grant program created in this bill – bringing the loss to $80 per student in 2018 and $25 per student in 2019.
Dallas ISD, which Meyer represents a small portion of, would gain $188 per student in 2018 and $190 per student in 2019, under this bill.
“I certainly support additional funding” for public education,” Meyer said Tuesday. “I respectfully vote no.”