SELECCIONA EL MES

ADVERTISEMENT 2

ADVERTISEMENT 3

Error: No articles to display

ADVERTISEMENT 1

ADVERTISEMENT 4

A+ A A-

WASHINGTON (AP) — After seven years, 2 million-plus deportations, two executive actions and 720,000 "Dreamers," the bottom line on President Barack Obama's immigration record still remains an open question for many immigrants and their advocates.

In the end, the Supreme Court may fill in the blank.

By agreeing to hear a challenge to Obama's immigration plan, the court on Tuesday raised hopes that Obama may have one last chance to make good on an unfulfilled promise to millions of immigrants, many of whom feel abandoned by his administration's recent deportation raids.

If the court sides with Obama, ruling that he has the authority to unilaterally shield up to 5 million immigrants from deportation, Obama would claim a sizable last win on an issue that has dogged him for years. His administration would, however, face another challenge — implementing a complex program in a matter of month as Republicans vow to reverse it just as quickly.

If the court rules against Obama, he could spend his last months in office making headlines for deporting people, rather than shielding them from deportation, as he'd planned.

At issue are Obama's actions to allow parents of U.S. citizens to stay in the country, along with an expansion of Obama's earlier program protecting people brought to the U.S. illegally as children — known as Dreamers. Lower courts have put those programs on hold amid claims Obama exceeded his authority, but the Supreme Court agreed to have the final word.

Advocates said they see the pivot point as a reflection of the seesaw nature of Obama's record on the issue. Despite his efforts to pass immigration legislation and use his executive power to protect some immigrants, his broader deportation policy led activists to label him the "deporter-in-chief" and left wounds some say won't be healed.

Most recently, advocates were incensed by deportation raids targeting 121 Central American immigrants, arguing the raids sowed fear and skepticism in a community that could make it harder for advocates and the administration to persuade people to come forward later.

Angela Maria Kelley, an immigration expert at the liberal Center for American Progress, likened Obama's policies to a "high school romance: One minute you're in love, the next you're being dumped.

"It does feel like it can take on a bipolar presence in the community," Kelley said.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on Obama's executive action by late June. That would leave Obama with barely half a year to get the program up and running before his presidency ends. Most of the Republicans running to replace Obama have already vowed to tear up the program if elected.

Obama's expanded program for people brought here as children was hours away from being launched last year when a judge put it on hold, so ostensibly, the administration could flick the switch on almost overnight with little additional preparation.

But the much larger program for parents of U.S. citizens wasn't nearly as far along when the court shut it down.

Ahead of the injunction, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services had secured office space in Arlington, Virginia, for a new processing center, with plans to hire about 1,000 people to screen applications. But the administration would have to hire and train those workers, finalize the forms and application process, and disseminate that information to applicants.

Administration officials predicted that could take anywhere from a few weeks to a couple of months. By comparison, it took 60 days to launch the initial program covering people brought here as children.

"We're certainly interested in moving forward with implementing these executive actions as expeditiously as possible," said White House spokesman Josh Earnest.

Another hold-up could come from applicants, who would need to pull together application fees and documents proving they've been in the country for years. How quickly the government could process applications is another question.

In the first six months of Obama's earlier program for people brought here as children, 200,000 were approved out of roughly 423,000 applications.

Working against the president is deep uncertainty about what happens to those who apply for protection if a Republican who opposes Obama's actions wins the White House. New applications would almost certainly be halted, but immigration advocates predicted the next president would find it harder to retract work permits from those approved before Obama leaves office.

"There's a real question right now of whether people are safe from deportation, not the least because in the last few weeks we've seen increased raids by the president," said Karen Tumlin, legal director at the National Immigration Law Center. "But folks are so eager to have the protections from family separation, if the chance does present itself, I would anticipate a tremendous outpouring of interest."

 

Read more...

A year after host Neil Patrick Harris quipped that the Oscars were honoring Hollywood's "best and whitest," the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences unveiled yet another all-white slate of acting nominees Thursday, prompting a dismayed revival of the "OscarsSoWhite" hashtag.

Many also expressed regret that the highly admired N.W.A biopic "Straight Outta Compton" failed to score a best picture nod, despite being recognized in other contests. In acting categories, omissions included Idris Elba in "Beasts of No Nation" and Will Smith in "Concussion."

Those voicing disappointment included the academy's president herself, Cheryl Boone Isaacs.

"I really was disappointed," Isaacs told The Associated Press when asked about "Compton," which did receive a screenplay nomination (for, some noted on Twitter, its white screenwriters, not its black cast or director). "Fabulous movie, fabulous movie."

But Isaacs, who is black, added that the Oscar nominations are part of a much broader conversation in the entertainment industry about diversity — and that change would happen, albeit slowly.

"What is important is that this entire conversation of diversity is here and we are talking about it," Isaacs said. "And I think we will not just talk, because people will say, 'Well don't just talk, you gotta do,' (but) talking gets to the doing, and we are going to do. ... It is an industry-wide situation and we need to continue this conversation. We need to bring in new talent, to nourish the talent, to allow it to flourish and to give us all the diversity of storytelling which is what the motion picture business is all about."

There was widespread surprise that the lack of diversity persisted despite the marked backlash a year ago when — like this year — all acting nominees were white and there was only one director of color, eventual winner Alejandro Inarritu (also nominated Thursday, for "The Revenant"). The most notable omissions involved the lauded civil rights drama "Selma"; both its director, Ava DuVernay, and its star, David Oyelowo, were passed over.

"It's business as usual at the academy," said Gil Robertson, president of the African-American Film Critics Association, on Thursday. "We'll have to try again. After the whole debacle with 'Selma' and Ava DuVernay, you would have thought some lessons would have been learned. Nothing for Will Smith. Nothing for Idris Elba. Irony of ironies, the only actor who received a nomination for 'Creed' is white." (He was referring to Sylvester Stallone, who got a supporting actor nod for reprising his role as Rocky Balboa. Co-star Michael B. Jordan was not nominated, nor was director Ryan Coogler.)

Film producer and director Reginald Hudlin, who is co-producer of this year's Oscar telecast, called the situation "frustrating."

"Maybe if there's 50 great films by black filmmakers, they will get three nominations," said Hudlin, who produced "Django Unchained."

"And again, that's not putting down the movies that are nominated, they're wonderful," said Hudlin. "It's just a frustrating thing that the voting doesn't reflect what America is saying very loud and clear, what the world is saying very loud and clear."

Many tweeted their disapproval on Thursday.

"I love @TheSlyStallone," wrote indie director Joe Carnahan, "but Michael B. Jordan, Tessa Thompson & Ryan Coogler don't get noms for CREED!? Come on Academy."

"Zero nonwhite actors have been nominated for Oscars," tweeted the Tribeca Film Festival. "There's no excuse."

"Compton" did receive a screenwriting nod, and one of its writers said she sees hope for change on the diversity issue in Hollywood. "I was actually at a town hall meeting on diversity last night, and I think it's an exciting time to be having this conversation in Hollywood," said writer Andrea Berloff. "It is not being ignored, and there's a lot of us working at a more grassroots level to try to turn the tides."

Berloff added that there was a key positive note for women in the nominations list: four women nominated for their screenplays this year.

 

"That's a huge success," Berloff said, "and I hope we can really take the time to celebrate. It's a huge victory."

Read more...

PASADENA, Calif. (AP) — 

Caitlyn Jenner changed her life last year. Now she's living it.

After coming out as a woman in the first season of "I Am Cait," Jenner is focused on increasing her knowledge about transgender issues and advocating on behalf of the community in the E! reality show's second season debuting March 6.

Jenner and her posse of five other transgender women embark on a road trip that begins in Los Angeles and winds its way to the Grand Canyon, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Tulsa, Oklahoma, New York, Chicago, Iowa, Kansas City, St. Louis and New Orleans on the series.

"We opened up this conversation, but in opening it up there are so many issues in this community that we need to talk about and deal with," Jenner told a gathering of TV critics on Thursday. "I want to change people's thinking on this issue. It's not an issue that has borders. It is all over the world. I would love to take this show global."

Jenner comes out of her shell, leaving the comfort of her Malibu home to interact with the transgender community while exploring dating and romance. Her changing relationships with her children and the Kardashian clan, including ex-wife Kris Jenner, are shown in Season 2.

"For almost my entire life, I never really liked going out. I never really felt like I fit in. I was more of a loner," she said. "Now after transitioning, I actually enjoy going out."

When she's in public, Jenner said she takes 50 selfies daily with mostly young women and boys.

"The next group of people coming up really has a different look at all of this," she said.

The 66-year-old former Olympic decathlon champion resists the media's label of voice for transgender people.

"I am only a spokesman for me and my story," she said. "I have so much to learn in this community. I have so much to learn about womanhood. The platform is not for me. It's for this community."

 

Read more...

Rss Module

The News Gram Online. All rights reserved.

Register

User Registration
or Cancel